More Tenancy Tribunal Shenanigans
Interested readers may well remember the document supplied as an eviction notice which I published in my post below.
Fraudulent eviction notices
It is a new level of criminal activity when the tenancy tribunal who have no legal jurisdiction to issue an eviction warrant seemingly do so or more likely that a warrant to seize possession has been forged to force me out of premises whilst I am appealing a decision through the District Court.
The Tenancy Tribunal does have legal jurisdiction to order an eviction if this was part of an application and therefore the process of a hearing still needs to be adhered to, the respondant needs to be notified and have an opportunity to be heard at the hearing. This did not occur in my case and yet as you can see the notice indicates it was issued by the Tenancy Tribunal.
When eviction is not part of an application, then the process must be through the Courts where eviction can be ordered by a District Court Judge. Quite possibly on account of the appeal that I lodged, if the Lees had made a legitimate application, the Judge clearly did not see it as justified.
And so some of the reluctance about Tenancy Services not providing the list of abandoned goods to the Tenancy Tribunal and the Tenancy Tribunal’s stonewalling on the disclosure now makes sense in light of this.
Whilst I appreciate that this should not be the way that justice should be conducted, I am providing photos of primary documents and real time email communications to inform the wider public of how coverups of wrongdoing occur.
Here is the email communication related to requests for evidence and formal documents relating to the case.
aucklandmetrotenancy
Wed, Mar 20, 9:03 AM (5 days ago)
Kia Ora
I hope you're having a great day!I wanted to let you know that the process for presenting evidence during a hearing is straightforward. All you need to do is add your evidence and make your case.
During my quick search on Google, I found out that the PrintScreen you forwarded to me is related to properties 31 and 30 on King Edward Parade. However, our records show you were a tenant at property 39 on King Edwards Parade.
If you have any further questions or concerns, please don't hesitate to reach out to me. I'm always here to help.
Ngā mihi
Marina Campos
Court Registry Officer I Civil Jurisdiction
Ministry of Justice | Tahu o te Ture
Auckland District Court
aucklandmetrotenancy@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz
Yinchi Moon <temenos4@gmail.com>
Mar 20, 2024, 10:07 AM (5 days ago)
to aucklandmetrotenancy
Dear Marina
So grateful for your comprehensive and transparent response. . You asked for evidence - I have provided it, you don't like it, so obviously in a matter like this the Tribunal would turn to a "quick google search"...
The problem with relying on the internet in justice matters is that it can also be manipulated and changed for all sorts of reasons. Such as properties being amalgamated. But what a strange thing - you don't appear to have included a screenshot of your discovery - perhaps you could do so. I would so appreciate that,
aucklandmetrotenancy
11:17 AM (1 hour ago)
Kia Ora
The Tribunal has not posted a hard copy of the file yet, as the applicants need to update their applications first. However, I am informing you that you have received a copy of the file as requested on the 11th of March.
The Tribunal has emailed the applicants requesting that they update their application on your behalf. It is important that both parties liaise in this regard.
Ngā mihi
Marina Campos
Court Registry Officer I Civil Jurisdiction
Ministry of Justice | Tahu o te Ture
Auckland District Court
aucklandmetrotenancy@justice.govt.nz | www.justice.govt.nz
Yinchi Moon
11:58 AM (0 minutes ago)
to aucklandmetrotenancy
Marina
1.You advised that you had access to a Google document which disproved my claim that the address was zoned as commercial. I have asked you to provide that which you have not. It is a reasonable request under these circumstances.
2. The Lees evidence which you emailed me showed they have supplied the evidence requested relating to abandoned property to Tenancy Services. Tenancy Services have not attached it to the file for some reason but they should have as it forms part of the Lees application. The Lees indicated in their communications relating to the "Tenancy Tribunal" eviction threats that they had followed advice from Tenancy Services and it is very clear that Margaret documents everything. Perhaps one of the reasons for withholding these documents is that they show that Tenancy Services have been complicit in not following due process for how an application for an eviction authorised by the Tenancy Tribunal should be carried out.
I am letting you know the consequences of the process not being followed will be eventually addressed through the Courts. Whilst I had to cancel the appeal to the TT decision in the Courts due to the trauma and the escalating personal attacks by the Lees, I am in a much better position to mount a legal Appeal against the Tribunal and the Lees about an illegal eviction notice and therefore theft of property and unlawful entry in the future.
3. It is an unreasonable expectation for the Tribunal to expect 2 parties who are clearly not communicating to send information to each other. That is the whole point of a 3rd party ie yourselves to ensure that the information is proved.
I am afraid if I do not have that information which they have indicated that they have already supplied, then the hearing will need to be postponed until I do. I have requested it by mail which means that I will need to receive it before Easter. I have advised you that I have internet problems and someone mucking around with my internet files and although you have emailed me a document, you undertook to post me the documents and it appears that you have still not done that a week later.
Carole
One of the cornerstones of a civilised society is having a justice system that follows the process. It is extremely concerning that at a time when a housing shortage means that tenants are more vulnerable to being exploited in an unfair power dynamic; that it appears that Tenancy Services and the Tenancy Tribunal are actively colluding with illegal behaviour. To produce an illegal document that evicts someone, makes them homeless; bad mouths them as a bad tenant which makes their chances of getting a rental elsewhere impossible; makes it well nigh on impossible for them to remove all their property and then steals it and then applies to make them pay more for their own stuff… I just do not have words for what that is.
Yes there are some bad tenants who intentionally do not pay rent but there are also some bad landlords who intentionally cause harm. That is the purpose of a so called 3rd party to negotiate that with fairness and in the context of the power differential. But if the 3rd party does not do that with integrity, then we are left with “legalised” abuse to vulnerable people. I want people to have knowledge from actual documents, not from allegations, but the documents show what is going on. We just have to want to see.
Yinchi Moon = Carole Elizabeth Tanner, former tenant in Devonport and Mangowhai, where she was evicted after Tenancy Tribunal orders. She almost certainly fits the criteria of Robert Hare’s Psychopathy Checklist. She’s a long-term sickness beneficiary living in ‘transitional’ accommodation for the past six months, for which she’s shown no gratitude at all; indeed, on this platform, she’s abused Salvation Army management. She frequently abuses landlords, neighbours, and authority figures; and has had run-ins with the Ombudsman, hospital boards (after time in a Whangarei psych unit), police, newspaper editors, and numerous official bodies and departments. She’s arrogant, rude, aggressive, deceitful, manipulative, morose, and unconcerned in the least about the feelings of anyone else. Her father was jailed for significant embezzlement. She, herself, has been investigated for tax evasion. She failed to be registered as a psychologist as she did not meet minimum professional requirements; thus, she turned to the unregistered field of therapy, although she’s had very few clients. All mentions of work on YouTube or Substack relate to short-term employment with Corrections decades ago. Carole is an ardent Trump supporter, and denigrates women and immigrants, particularly Asian on line. When she could be looking for accommodation or employment, she writes these long, long, garbled posts. Steer very clear.
If you’d like more information, email: Kiri.Arnold@gmail.com I’ll continue posting until Carole Tanner shows remorse or other pro-social behaviour.